Quantcast
Channel: Microcontrollers
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 217581

Forum Post: RE: AM2632: RBL secondary bootlocation 0xF0000 is not working

$
0
0
[quote userid="561607" url="~/support/microcontrollers/arm-based-microcontrollers-group/arm-based-microcontrollers/f/arm-based-microcontrollers-forum/1475751/am2632-rbl-secondary-bootlocation-0xf0000-is-not-working/5734418#5734418"]I think, the check to flash only to offsets, which are a multiple of the erase block size, may have a reason, which I cannot overview.... But with this restriction, it is not possible to use flash devices with a block size other than 64kB in combination with alternative SBL address ot firmware start addresses, which are not a multiple of 0x4_0000)[/quote] Hi Jo, I do not understand this properly, the property of NOR flash is that writes are supported at block level only, so as long as you enter the correct block size thr flash write would work. [quote userid="561607" url="~/support/microcontrollers/arm-based-microcontrollers-group/arm-based-microcontrollers/f/arm-based-microcontrollers-forum/1475751/am2632-rbl-secondary-bootlocation-0xf0000-is-not-working/5734418#5734418"]What is the reason for the code lines (restriction to multiples of eraseBlockSize)[/quote] When it comes to writing for NOR flashes, you will always have to erase the whole block before writing.

Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 217581

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>