Hi Fernando, A few things to check: For OnTargetConnect() in the gel file (ti\ccs2010\ccs\ccs_base\emulation\gel\f2800156.gel): Are you commenting out the GEL_Reset() call? Are you commenting out the RAM initialization lines? In CCS > Project Properties > Debug > Connection Options: Do you have "Reset the target on a connect" unchecked? Are you starting a Project-less Debug session? Right click the ccxml and select "Start Project-less Debug" Then connect to the CPU1 core Are there any other changes you're making? Best, Matt
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F2800156-Q1: Attach to a running target
↧
Forum Post: RE: LAUNCHXL-F28379D: Request for Access to Material on Tuning PI Controllers
Hi ChrisClearman Thank you so much for sending me the link to the E2E discussion. I really appreciate your help! Best regards, Javier A. Martín Delgado
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F280025: How to specify a variable that holds its value at next reboot when DSP is forced to reset by hardware watchdog?
Hi RC. Glad you were able to figure out a workaround. Did you by chance have a chance to read section 6.9.18 The NOINIT and PERSISTENT Pragmas? I believe using NOINIT with the LOCATION might work with you. Regards, Ozino
↧
Forum Post: RE: EVM430-FR6047: Measuring power consumption
I think I found the problem, but I can't verify it. The TIDA-01486 amplifier board is set up with some switching logic and op amps to increase the functionality of the EVM430-FR4067 from 1 pair of transducers to 2 pairs of transducers. There are four different receive paths, and each of those receive paths use a bias voltage that is created from the 3.3 V power rail with foltage dividers. And the 4 voltage dividers draw a total of 105.6 uA. By subtracting that 105.6 uA from my measured 116 uA I get about 11 uA of operational current drawn from my 3.3 V rail. The switching and logic might draw anout 5 uA or so. So without the amplifier board connected, I should get a pretty low measured power consumption.
↧
Forum Post: RE: MSPM0L1106: UniFlash with error : Data Block Size less than 1KB!!! Verification Failed for Datablock at0x9F00
Hi Alan, 1. You are correct 2. Does the error appears when you try to read the memory using the Memory Browser at that specific address? I'll let the software team know about your suggestion. Best Regards, Diego Abad
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: MSPM0C1104: Invalid field definitions in CMSIS pack SVD file
Hi Tamme, Let me consult the software team about this. Best Regards, Diego Abad
↧
Forum Post: RE: MSPM0L1106: Question on GPIO settings :
Hi Alan, Can you share your sysconfig file? I want to check if there may be something wrong with it. Also, the way to set up the output will be to add the "DL_GPIO_enableOutput" function after the initDigitalOutput & setPins. Also keep in mind Keith's comment on the pin having a pull-down resistor in the launchpad. Best Regards, Diego Abad
↧
Forum Post: RE: MSPM0C1104: MSPM0C1104
Hi Thomas, Let me ask around if there is any possibility for compatibility with the Arduino IDE. Most likely it's that it won't be though. Best Regards, Diego Abad
↧
Forum Post: RE: MSP430F2013: Min IREF
Hi Frangline, I will have to get you back on this information. In the meantime, do you know what current reading the customer reads? Best Regards, Diego Abad
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: MSPM0C1103: wake from SHUTDOWN
Hi Brian, Let me confirm with my team about this. Best Regards, Diego Abad
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMDSHSECDOCK: Edge Connector HSEC8-160 wrong orientation and position of pin 1
Thank you for checking. I believe this is a general issue in the interface definition that applies to all controlCARD that use the HSEC8 edge connector. Therefore I believe it will be impossible to fix without introducing a breaking change with the entire controlCARD family. In any case, I think this flipped pin numbering should be stated more clearly, when referencing the Samtec HSEC8 connector.
↧
Forum Post: RE: MSP430F2013: Min IREF
The highlighted numbers is the current the reference module uses to operate. It is to let you to budget current requirements for low power operations. I think what you care about is the Vref maximum load current which tells you how much current you can safely draw from the pin.
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F2800156-Q1: Attach to a running target
Hi Matt: I have tried these steps, I have managed to connect to the MCU without resetting but it still halts I have also unchecked the Halt on Connect from the Debug properties. What could be still missing? Thanks in advance, Fernando
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F2800156-Q1: Trouble Setting Breakpoint with the Action "Remain Halted" at 0x8058
Hi Shuqing, Please allow me some time to look over the CCS configuration. In the meantime, please advise the customer to monitor the XRSn line during programming and screenshot what is happening when it fails. Next Monday, I'll discuss what could be causing the device to be stuck in the boot ROM with a colleague. I've also ordered parts to replicate the issue and will try to replicate once I receive them, but that could take weeks. Best, Matt
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F2800137: F2800137 Global load of AQCTLA
Forgot to say that PWM are variable frequency but control is fixe.
↧
Forum Post: RE: AM2634: AM263X & F28P65X : CAN communication issue
Hello, Which device first encounters the failure? Can you probe the CAN_H/CAN_L lines and provide screenshots? We need to see exactly what the signal between the two devices looks like. Can you also probe the CAN_TX/CAN_RX lines of the failing device? I am also working to get a setup going in parallel to attempt to replicate the issue. Can you share the project files being used for both devices for additional debug? Best Regards, Zackary Fleenor
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMDSHSECDOCK: Edge Connector HSEC8-160 wrong orientation and position of pin 1
Eyke, Yes I agree, I'll note this fact for future HSEC-based EVM designs and documentation. Please close this thread if there are no further questions. Regards, Brennan
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28379S: Issue with Serial Flash Programming using SCI Bootloader example from C2000ware
Hey Rajamurugan, Can you try inserting a no-op at the bottom of the while loop in the function SCI_GetFunction in SCI_GetFunction.c? The resulting code snippet will look like: // // Send the packet and if NAK send again. // while(SCI_SendPacket(command, statusCode.status, 12, (Uint16*)&statusCode.address, statusCode.flashAPIError, (Uint16*)&statusCode.flashAPIFsmStatus)) // // Get next Packet // __asm(" NOP"); command = SCI_GetPacket(&length, data); //get next packet Best, Alex
↧
Forum Post: TMS320F28375D: Dual Core Sysconfig Project Setup
Part Number: TMS320F28375D Other Parts Discussed in Thread: C2000WARE , SYSCONFIG Tool/software: Hello! Device: F28375D C2000Ware version: 5.01 CCS version: 12.6.0.00008 I have an existing single core (cpu1 only) project with Sysconfig generating various files. This project uses .project +.cproject files, NOT .projectspec. I am trying now to now split this project into two cores. I have created two different .syscfg files, one with --context "CPU1" and the other with --context "CPU2". I tried two methods: 1) creating a single project with two different build configurations. CPU1 configuration excludes the CPU2 syscfg. CPU2 configuration excludes CPU1 syscfg. 2) creating two projects, one for CPU1 and one for CPU2, each with their corresponding syscfg files. In both cases, I'm having the following issues: a) clocktree.h doesn't get generated by the CPU2's syscfg, the CPU2 project does not have access to clock constants. b) ipc / interrupt settings show warnings, indicating that the settings cannot be checked correctly without the context of the other CPU. c) I cannot see the CPU1 and CPU2 tabs to allow editing multi-core syscfg mode. I see many online resources referencing these tabs. These problems all seem to be caused because the 2 syscfg files do not seem to be aware of each other. I noticed that in all of the dual core example projects I have seen, .projectspec files are used to define two separate projects (CPU1 and CPU2) in the same .projectspec file. Are we required to use the .projectspec file, with two separate projects for each CPU, in order to use syscfg in dual-core mode? Or can we use the .project + .cproject files (either 1 project with 2 configurations, or 2 separate projects)?
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F280049C: TMS320F280049C-56RSH
e2e.ti.com/.../2210.ADC_5F00_Test.zip I have attached the test code. I hope you will check it. Thank You
↧