[quote userid="494894" url="~/support/microcontrollers/c2000-microcontrollers-group/c2000/f/c2000-microcontrollers-forum/1467905/tms320f28388d-certification-of-sto-process-for-sil-3-inquiry-on-safety-certified-tools"]For our IDE , we are using CCS 18.0 . Could you confirm whether this IDE has any safety certification or if it can be classified as T1 under IEC 61508?[/quote] Please see: https://e2e.ti.com/support/tools/code-composer-studio-group/ccs/f/code-composer-studio-forum/882565/ccs-code-composer-studio-at-iec-61508 Thanks ki
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28388D: Certification of STO Process for SIL 3 – Inquiry on Safety-Certified Tools
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28388D: TMS320F28388D
[quote userid="640530" url="~/support/microcontrollers/c2000-microcontrollers-group/c2000/f/c2000-microcontrollers-forum/1468626/tms320f28388d-tms320f28388d"]It shows program make found not in path . We have ensured the make file exists in the project directory.[/quote] CCS does not looks for the make utility in the project directory. Please specify the full path to make or add the directory to the system path. Thanks ki
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: MSPM0G3507: Secondary boot looader stop SWD functionality of board and need factory reset every time.
As it mentioned in Readme file of example code of secondary bootloader once this code loaded in device only sec bootloader is active and default bootloader is inactive and to revert this we need to do factory reset. So my question is if secondary bootloader is in device SWD is not working? is it not possible to load program again using debug port?
↧
Forum Post: RE: AM2432: AM2432: UART register access time
Hi, I will be taking this issue forward. Allow me a day to reproduce this with the test code which you have sent out. Regards, Vaibhav
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28P550SJ: Configurable Logic Block (CLB) - How do I get started?
[quote userid="637270" url="~/support/microcontrollers/c2000-microcontrollers-group/c2000/f/c2000-microcontrollers-forum/1458312/tms320f28p550sj-configurable-logic-block-clb---how-do-i-get-started/5641957#5641957"] but the communication rate doubled the expected value (5Mbps, sysclk=150M, TFORMAT_CLB_CLK=75M, TFORMAT_BUS_CLK=2.5M). Therefore, I changed TFORMAT_CLB_CLK to 150M. 1. Should TFORMAT_CLB_CLK actually be sysclk/2? [/quote] On the P65x, the CLB can be clocked either from the ePWM clock or from the AUXPLL. If you have configured the device for SYSCLK = 150 MHz and ePWM = 150 MHz then CLBCLK will also be 150 MHz. Side note Some older devices have a limitation of ePWM < 100 MHz. This is probably why there is /2 in the example. P65X does not have this limitation.
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: LP-EM-CC2745R10-Q1: Issue with CC2745-Based MCU on TI LaunchPad
Hello Jay, I really appreciate the amount of detail you provided! For the first issue, I see the same problem on my end. I have communicated the problem to out Code Composer Studio team. In the meantime, please import projects from the SDK instead of creating projects through the project wizard. For the second concern, OAD example projects are not flashed using CCS. Instead, the projects are altered, and built in CCS, then flashed via Uniflash at a specific memory address. Please reference the OAD SimpleLink Academy for more information. Let me know if you have any other questions. Thanks, Isaac
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28P550SJ: Configurable Logic Block (CLB) - How do I get started?
[quote userid="637270" url="~/support/microcontrollers/c2000-microcontrollers-group/c2000/f/c2000-microcontrollers-forum/1458312/tms320f28p550sj-configurable-logic-block-clb---how-do-i-get-started/5641957#5641957"]Inoticed that SPI started receiving data prematurely, with an extra 11 bits of high level received. I speculate that during the encoder's response time, the SPI clk continued to generate, leading to this issue. I then measured the encoder's response time to commands, which was approximately 2.9us, equivalent to 2.9us/400ns=7.25bits, which does not match the actual situation. I would like to ask about the causes of this situation and possible solutions?[/quote] Can you capture the waveforms for the request/response like the examples below? Does the SW complain about a CRC error?
↧
Forum Post: RE: XDS110ISO-EVM: Which of the XDS110ISO EVM pins is required for the SWD protocol?
Ok, thank you for the feedback.
↧
Forum Post: RE: LAUNCHXL-F280039C: Missing TOOLS tab (and Windows Tab) - CCS 20.0.2
Hi Jordan, Can you link which tutorial you're referencing? On CCS 20, the graph can be found under the "View" tab. Best, Matt
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28379D: Is there a max frequency that the 28379D DAC can output?
Hi, The maximum output frequency will be limited by the DAC settling time. Best Regards, Ben Collier
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F280039C: FSI TDM and daisy chain configuration problem with multi slave mode
Can you explain what do you mean because FSI packets are not re-transmitted by the device in the implementation? thanks much
↧
Forum Post: RE: MCU-PLUS-SDK-AM243X: Fails 60-80% when writing HS-SE conversion key writer via usb_dfu_uniflash.py other flash writers work consistently.
Hello Prashant, Could you please help to test using an input string "START_PROGRAM_KEY" with echo to print this string out instead of using one char as above? int ret = DebugP_scanf("%s", cmd); That is the only difference that I can see between our side and your side. Thanks, Hong
↧
Forum Post: RE: F29H85X-SOM-EVM: led_ex2_blinky_cpu1_cpu2_cpu3_multi flash mode configuration programming is not working
Hi Martin, Could you provide me your field contact support? I am asking our team to ship you a new controlSOM with our latest fixes on the board. I think this issue is due to the hardware version you're using. Apologize for this. Best, Ryan Ma
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28P650DK: BOOSTXL-BUCKCONV
Hi Mike, What changes have you made in the code from the provided? The code has been developed to showcase ACMC so other builds apart from ACMC have not been tested. I don't believe there is an open-loop implementation either, it is just closed-loop from what I recall Regards, Peter
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F280039C: FSI TDM and daisy chain configuration problem with multi slave mode
Another question I have is, in order to follow the example code in SPRACM3 app note, can I use TMDSFSIADAPEVM adapter pair with TMDSCNCD280039C control card with docking station?
↧
Forum Post: RE: LAUNCHXL-F28379D: Abnormal heating up issues
Hi Ibrahim, Are you using the TMCS1133EVM or a custom design PCB board. If using custom PCB, are you following the layout guidance provided in the datasheet? The TMCS1133 is a high bandwidth current-sensor which may lead to noisy output. Does your system require such a high bandwidth or can lower bandwidth part be used? Also, what is the range of your voltage sense inputs? Regards, Peter
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28377D: printf statement showing some magic character on consol
Hi Michael, Is this issue happening on multiple devices or just a single device? What CCS version and C2000Ware version are you using in this project? I sent you a friendship request so you can also forward me the example project where you are seeing this issue. Regards, Peter
↧
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F2800137: Flash Erase Issue in 137
Hi Nilesh, As per my understanding customer is trying to update KMs value every time (flash address + 4) location when an update comes. Is that correct? Also, are you able to see values are getting programmed in flash location? Is flash api is executed from RAM or Flash? Regards, Rajeshwary
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28388D: Problem using "IPC message copy to RAM boot" to start CM
If you turn of optimization does it work as expected? If i understand correctly, the code works when loading CM directly via CCS instead of through CPU1 at runtime?
↧
Forum Post: RE: TMS320F28377D: hex file not working
Hi, I'll need some more info regarding this post, when you say "project doesn't accept any CAN messages", do you have it running in CCS during debug? Uniflash only loads the project and does not have debug capability. Thanks, Charles
↧