Part Number: LP-AM261 Other Parts Discussed in Thread: UNIFLASH , Tool/software: Hello, my customer is developing with LP-AM261 and has found inconsisten behaviour when flashing their application based on CCS or UniFlash. Used versions: Code Composer Studio (CCS): 20.0.1 UniFlash: 9.0.0 While the application works reliably when flashed with CCS, flashing the same image with UniFlash results in inconsistent behavior. The goal is to use UniFlash to automate the flashing process. Observation: • Both tools report a successful flash operation – no errors are shown. • It seems UniFlash may not be writing the image completely or to the correct address in flash. • CCS may be performing additional initialization (e.g., peripheral setup, clock config, reset state), which is not happening when booting directly from flash after a UniFlash session. • I am using the same binary or output file (.bin/.out) with both tools. Questions: 1. Are there any known differences between CCS and UniFlash in how they write to flash on the AM261x? 2. How can I ensure that UniFlash writes the image to exactly the same address as CCS? 3. Are there recommended settings for UniFlash (e.g., full chip erase, verify after write) to ensure a clean flash process? 4. Is a specific image format, header, or toolchain step required to prepare the image for proper flashing and booting with UniFlash? Best regards Manuel
↧