Hi Dan, [quote userid="554973" url="~/support/microcontrollers/arm-based-microcontrollers-group/arm-based-microcontrollers/f/arm-based-microcontrollers-forum/1413900/msp432e411y-msp432e411y-simplelink-vs-tm4c129-tivaware/5414419#5414419"]Are the hardware design files still archived/hosted? I might design a quick dev-board for the chips and have them fabricated for evaluation. [/quote] You can find the user's guide at https://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/spmu360 which has the schematic in it. Also the design files can be found at this product website. https://www.ti.com/tool/TIDM-CONNECTED-ETHERNET [quote userid="554973" url="~/support/microcontrollers/arm-based-microcontrollers-group/arm-based-microcontrollers/f/arm-based-microcontrollers-forum/1413900/msp432e411y-msp432e411y-simplelink-vs-tm4c129-tivaware"] Q2) Does the TM4C129 have any RTOS examples available that I could look through (perhaps also using LVGL)? I wasn’t able to find any in the SDK. From what I understand, the SimpleLink SDK is mainly focused on the easy addition of interconnectivity expansion such as Ethernet / WiFi. Some of our future projects may require this, but the current one does not. Q3) Are there any advantages to using the SimpleLink SDK over the TivaWare SDK, or vice versa? Q4) Which chip would you personally suggest adopting currently in 2024? [/quote] You can download RTOS examples for TM4C129 from CCS Resource Explorer. See below. The SimpleLink SDK platform is a common software development platform across many TI MCUs. The driver API will be the same independent of which TI MCU. That is the only advantage of using SL. If you have been using TivaWare SDK for your past designs, I will suggest you stay with TivaWare. Although no real personal preference, I will choose TM4C129 because I'm more familiar with TivaWare than SimpleLink from support point of view.
↧